There’s something exhilarating about building a house on the side of a mountain or hillside. It’s like you’re on the precipice of the world looking out at all the possibilities. But building on a sloped site is not easy. You have to figure out how the structure wants to relate to the terrain, how the foundation will be designed to support the house, and if the construction crew can operate machinery around the site. Feasibility studies help uncover a lot of these constraints and opportunities.
In our Lincoln Bluff project in Washington, we designed a home that was built into the hillside and cantilevered out above it. We also completed a comprehensive architectural feasibility study for an undeveloped property along a ravine in Columbus, OH. It was a small lot with an even smaller buildable area above a 30-foot shale cliff. As we learned about the constraints and opportunities of building on a sloped site, we studied the various massing ideas for the home. To us, good architecture should always take advantage of the site and give it a more significant role in the architecture rather than leveling off the grade and plopping the house down.
Summarized below are 4 massing strategies and project examples for building a home on a sloped site. A good design concept should include one or more of these strategies:
- Sitting the house ON the ground
- Embedding the house INTO the ground
- Floating the house ABOVE the ground
- Sticking the house OUT OVER the slope
1. Sitting the house on the ground
Sitting the house on the ground is the traditional, straightforward approach. It utilizes one of the easiest construction methods and is economical because it minimizes excavation and foundation costs, provided you’re not doing a lot of site grading to level off the earth.
The Ravine House by Darcy Jones Architects. Photo by Ema Peter Photography.
Dalarna House by Dive Architects. Photo by Åke E:son Lindman.
2. Embedding the house into the ground
Embedding the house into the ground helps integrate it better with the land than simply sitting it down on top of it. The home feels grounded and is more responsive to the terrain. It can sit lower to the ground if you locate programmed space that traditionally is on the 2nd-story level to the lower level that is buried in the hillside. This low-slung appearance is a great way to minimize the massing of the home as seen from the road or from elevations above.
However, with this approach comes increased excavation and foundation costs. You’re digging out more earth and hauling it away, and you need thicker foundation walls to retain the earth of the sunken house form.
Below are two examples of embedding the house in the ground.
Wakatipu Heights House by Mason & Wales Architects. Photo by Marina Mathews Photography.
Detached House T by Kreiner Architects. Photo by Volker Wortmeyer.
You can also embed the house in the ground with a reverse floor plan. This works well if access is from above. In this case, you can organize the floor plan so that the main public spaces are on the upper level (where your front entry may be) and your private bedroom spaces are on the lower level. This gives your main living spaces the best view because they are higher up in the house. It may also help create a dramatic entry with a view.
House DB Klaus by Jürgen Hagspiel Architects. Photo by Norman Radon.
Bowen Island House by omb Architects + Designers. Photo by Ema Peter Photography.
Regardless of where access is, you could also do a terraced floor plan if space allows. In this strategy, you could stagger the floor levels, creating split levels or small changes in elevation. This works well if the goal is to create a meandering experience, to break up spaces without walling off rooms, or to better relate to the surrounding topography.
Terraced House by Hufft. Photo by Hufft.
E-type House by RTA Studio.
3. Floating the house above the ground
This approach raises the home on supports, whether on stilts, piers, or solid walls. The benefit of this approach is that you can minimize site disturbance with a smaller footprint. This can be especially important if you are trying to navigate large tree root structures, bedrock, or steep slopes.
With this strategy, you feel like you’re living in the trees since most of the programmed spaces are raised up on a higher floor level. You can also possibly see under the house clear through to the other side of the site depending on the floor plan. This is another way of connecting with the site visually.
X House by Snow Kreilich Architects. Photo by Corey Gaffer Photography.
Apus Rupanco by Aguilo Pedraza Architects. Photo by Marcos Zegers.
4. Sticking out over the slope
Lastly, one final approach is cantilevering the home. You can anchor part of the home to the site and extent the other half out over the terrain. This creates dramatic overlooks and views of the surroundings for an immersive and exhilarating experience. However, it does come at a cost since there will undoubtedly be structural implications to think about. This approach could also minimize site disturbance and help avoid significant foundation expenses.
Two Hulls House by MacKay-Lyons Sweetapple. Photo by Greg Richardson Photography.
Balancing Barn by MVRDV.
A Hybrid Approach
The above massing strategies are all viable options for building on sloped sites. The particulars of the site, design goals, and budget will all play a part in confirming which strategy or strategies are best.
Here’s one final thought on these strategies: It’s not uncommon to see two or more strategies for a custom home design on a sloped site. You could lift the home on piers and cantilever it out over site boulders. You could embed it in the earth on one side and stick it out on the other. You could terrace it across varying topographies where part of it is lifted above the ground and other parts are embedded.
Here are two projects we enjoy that combine two or more of the above strategies.
OZ Residence by Stanley Saitowitz | Natoma Architects. Photo by Bruce Damonte.
Schlotfeldt Residence by Omar Gandhi Architects. Photo by Ema Peter Photography.
At YR Architecture + Design, we strive to create modern custom homes that integrate with their surroundings no matter the landscape or design approach. In our opinion, how the structure speaks to the land and the responsive design that the home takes creates a more authentic solution that’s timeless and fitting of its place.
Good structures on sloppy. I would like to request lowlands